In a week in which the newspapers have been opportunistically filled with pictures of fresh-faced young women proudly clutching their A-Level results and the furore over the changing of GCSE grade boundaries, I recall my own schooldays and the path I followed through the education system.
It is now over seven years since I opened the envelope containing my own GCSE results. It was a moment that for so long seemed so distant, reserved for the older siblings of my school friends. It is true to say, when my own moment arrived, I was incredibly nervous. I had much the same feeling upon collecting my A-Levels and when awaiting the arrival of my degree results. At the time, these moments seemed so important, as if my entire future hinged on the contents of those envelopes.
In reality, each step merely facilitated the next stage in my education with the diffuse aim of eventually establishing a career. As soon as that next stage arrived, the marks, grades and results that seemed so fundamental a few months previously soon faded into irrelevance. Once at university, UCAS points meant nothing. Similarly, now I'm entering the job market, my academic achievements seem relatively insignificant to many employers. They bear little relevance to my ability to perform a particular role. Having a certain classification of degree is a requirement to apply but it is demonstrable 'soft skills' that secure jobs. The question I'd like to consider today is whether my path from GCSEs to Master's Degree has sufficiently furnished me with these cherished skills ('leadership', 'teamwork', 'organisation' etc.) and given what I know now, would I follow the same route?
I never really doubted that upon completion of my schooling I would go to university. In many ways, I was institutionalised. I was always a strong academic performer and I was fortunate enough to attend good state schools. Moreover, with both my parents having gone to university, it seemed an inevitability. I'm certain that attending university was the right choice for me, however the fact that while at school I never considered the alternatives is indicative of a wider problem. An ever greater proportion of young people have been drawn to higher education, while apprenticeships and other vocational courses have been neglected by comparison. University certainly isn't suited to everyone; schools must do more to make young people aware of the options open to them when they approach important academic milestones. Academic capability shouldn't be the only factor when considering whether an individual is suited to higher education. Amongst my friends and colleagues, I have encountered many who feel that they would be in a better position if they had entered the job market at 18. What is more, many of the 'soft skills' that employers are looking for are more obviously developed in the workplace.
The current state of the graduate job market and ever increasing levels of student debt are leading many to ask why they bothered with university. Personally, I shall cherish my student days as a formative period in my life. I can only hope that it won't be too long before I can put the skills and experience I gained to use in the workplace.
As ever, thank you for reading. I'd be particularly interested to hear from anyone who has been to university and subsequently regretted the decision. Please comment below.
Sunday 26 August 2012
Thursday 2 August 2012
Olympic Dreams
In a week when the nation has been gripped by the euphoria of the Olympic Games, I have come to an unfortunate realisation; I am unlikely to ever fulfil my childhood dreams of becoming an elite athlete.
After trying my hand at a number of sports as a youth, I soon found that I was distinctly average at pretty much all of them. At the humble age of 23, in sporting terms, I am past it. Take the example of Michael Phelps: the man has won 19 Olympic gold medals, amassed a small fortune in career earnings and is about to retire at the age of 27. I've got 4 years on Phelps, so I either need to get training for Rio 2016 or make my living like a mere mortal.
This highly topical preamble brings me round to the main point of this post: the trade off between earning a decent living and pursuing your career goals. I have always been envious of professional sportsmen; to make a career from something you love doing, something that may well have started off as a hobby or pastime, must be immensely satisfying. Unfortunately, for the majority of individuals, there must be at least a degree of sacrifice. To earn in a year even a fraction of what a footballer may earn in a week, graduates may find their way into careers they may not have originally foreseen. This is not to say that people cannot grow to love and enjoy their jobs, but I find it difficult to believe that many young children lie awake at night dreaming of becoming a management consultant or chartered accountant.
Everyone has different motivations. For some, a generous salary and the accoutrements of wealth are the only motivation. For others, job satisfaction and a healthy work/life balance are of more concern. As for myself, I want the nice house and the foreign holidays but not at the sacrifice of everything else. There are plenty of supposed 'graduate jobs' out there. As I've discussed before, jobs boards are full of advertisements from recruitment consultants offering immediate starts, £20k salaries plus £30k+ OTE; what is more, they require no previous experience and aren't specific about the subject of your degree. If you can handle the intensely competitive and commission based nature of the job then it certainly seems tempting.
I've been seriously searching for approaching 8 months and it's true to say I've been fussy. I've so far avoided the scatter-bomb technique of sending out CVs speculatively to as many employers as possible. Instead, I have focused on jobs that engage with my interests. As frustrating as it is to be earning £6.13 per hour (a generous 5p above minimum wage), I'd rather not sell my soul simply for the sake of a graduate job I have no interest in. To spend 40 hours a week working in a role that you dislike must be utterly soul destroying. I need to put my efforts into something I care about, something that engages me. If it pays well that will be a bonus.
For now, I shall continue as I have been. I might also try a few more sports, there's time yet...
After trying my hand at a number of sports as a youth, I soon found that I was distinctly average at pretty much all of them. At the humble age of 23, in sporting terms, I am past it. Take the example of Michael Phelps: the man has won 19 Olympic gold medals, amassed a small fortune in career earnings and is about to retire at the age of 27. I've got 4 years on Phelps, so I either need to get training for Rio 2016 or make my living like a mere mortal.
This highly topical preamble brings me round to the main point of this post: the trade off between earning a decent living and pursuing your career goals. I have always been envious of professional sportsmen; to make a career from something you love doing, something that may well have started off as a hobby or pastime, must be immensely satisfying. Unfortunately, for the majority of individuals, there must be at least a degree of sacrifice. To earn in a year even a fraction of what a footballer may earn in a week, graduates may find their way into careers they may not have originally foreseen. This is not to say that people cannot grow to love and enjoy their jobs, but I find it difficult to believe that many young children lie awake at night dreaming of becoming a management consultant or chartered accountant.
Everyone has different motivations. For some, a generous salary and the accoutrements of wealth are the only motivation. For others, job satisfaction and a healthy work/life balance are of more concern. As for myself, I want the nice house and the foreign holidays but not at the sacrifice of everything else. There are plenty of supposed 'graduate jobs' out there. As I've discussed before, jobs boards are full of advertisements from recruitment consultants offering immediate starts, £20k salaries plus £30k+ OTE; what is more, they require no previous experience and aren't specific about the subject of your degree. If you can handle the intensely competitive and commission based nature of the job then it certainly seems tempting.
I've been seriously searching for approaching 8 months and it's true to say I've been fussy. I've so far avoided the scatter-bomb technique of sending out CVs speculatively to as many employers as possible. Instead, I have focused on jobs that engage with my interests. As frustrating as it is to be earning £6.13 per hour (a generous 5p above minimum wage), I'd rather not sell my soul simply for the sake of a graduate job I have no interest in. To spend 40 hours a week working in a role that you dislike must be utterly soul destroying. I need to put my efforts into something I care about, something that engages me. If it pays well that will be a bonus.
For now, I shall continue as I have been. I might also try a few more sports, there's time yet...
Sunday 8 July 2012
CV Writing
After a two week hiatus from life as a graduate job seeker and part time blogger, it is time to once again put metaphorical pen to paper. I would like to say I've returned from Barcelona revitalised and ready for a fresh assault on the job market, but after a few days back at work I feel myself slipping back into the same old ennui. Best get to work applying for jobs and writing blogs...
As promised prior to my departure, I thought I would write about the difficult art of CV writing. For the majority of us, condensing all of your achievements on to two sides of A4 is certainly a challenge. With many people taking the route of GCSEs and A-Levels followed by a degree, simply listing your education can take up valuable space. Add in a few extra-curricular activities, work experience placements, part-time jobs and personal interests then writing a detailed CV becomes a serious exercise in brevity. Nevertheless, it is likely employers will only take a fleeting glance at your details when it lands on their desk so maximum impact is a necessity.
The first draft of my own CV was a definite fail in this respect. As someone who listed one of their strongest attributes as their lucid writing style, I set about proving this point with paragraphs of text. My CV eventually clocked in at a hefty four pages; I imagine any employer who looked at it for thirty seconds would remember little more than my name. So I set about ruthlessly editing, cutting and condensing; gone was my beautifully crafted prose only to be replaced by ugly bullet points and half sentences. The many sections were reduced to just two: education and relevant experience, arbitrary categories that erased many personal achievements dear to my heart (it seems my Thomas Alleyne's Community Service Award will be wiped from the slate of history). It was a trying experience, but after extensive formatting, my CV was a mere two pages and I'd like to think had a little more impact.
I am now in the situation that every time I find something worthy of a place on my CV, I must remove something less relevant. In fairness, that isn't too difficult seeing as a short period of exam invigilation still somehow makes the grade. Nevertheless, it is a little frustrating to be cutting things out when all you really want to do is demonstrate your strengths by telling potential employers as much about yourself as possible. I tell myself that is what interviews are for, but I can't help but feel my two pages of bullet points forms a document without a personality, a piece of paper that says so little about the person it is supposed to fully represent. Then again, if I were to write my CV in the same manner I write this blog I fear I may never get a job. Bullet points are perhaps a necessary evil!
Thanks once again for reading, your comments are encouraged as always!
As promised prior to my departure, I thought I would write about the difficult art of CV writing. For the majority of us, condensing all of your achievements on to two sides of A4 is certainly a challenge. With many people taking the route of GCSEs and A-Levels followed by a degree, simply listing your education can take up valuable space. Add in a few extra-curricular activities, work experience placements, part-time jobs and personal interests then writing a detailed CV becomes a serious exercise in brevity. Nevertheless, it is likely employers will only take a fleeting glance at your details when it lands on their desk so maximum impact is a necessity.
The first draft of my own CV was a definite fail in this respect. As someone who listed one of their strongest attributes as their lucid writing style, I set about proving this point with paragraphs of text. My CV eventually clocked in at a hefty four pages; I imagine any employer who looked at it for thirty seconds would remember little more than my name. So I set about ruthlessly editing, cutting and condensing; gone was my beautifully crafted prose only to be replaced by ugly bullet points and half sentences. The many sections were reduced to just two: education and relevant experience, arbitrary categories that erased many personal achievements dear to my heart (it seems my Thomas Alleyne's Community Service Award will be wiped from the slate of history). It was a trying experience, but after extensive formatting, my CV was a mere two pages and I'd like to think had a little more impact.
I am now in the situation that every time I find something worthy of a place on my CV, I must remove something less relevant. In fairness, that isn't too difficult seeing as a short period of exam invigilation still somehow makes the grade. Nevertheless, it is a little frustrating to be cutting things out when all you really want to do is demonstrate your strengths by telling potential employers as much about yourself as possible. I tell myself that is what interviews are for, but I can't help but feel my two pages of bullet points forms a document without a personality, a piece of paper that says so little about the person it is supposed to fully represent. Then again, if I were to write my CV in the same manner I write this blog I fear I may never get a job. Bullet points are perhaps a necessary evil!
Thanks once again for reading, your comments are encouraged as always!
Sunday 17 June 2012
It's Not All Bad...
It has come to my attention, while perusing my first dozen or so posts, that perhaps my blog has taken an overly cynical and negative tone. This was by no means my intention when I set out to document my thoughts on the graduate job market. While it is certainly demoralising to make so little tangible progress in my search for meaningful employment, I will in future endeavour not to let this frustration colour my writing. I certainly do not want anyone to feel sorry for me, there are many other graduates in far more testing circumstances than my own. And so, I feel I must write this short and positive assessment of my current situation.
When I look at the facts I am in a healthy position. I am living at home and so face no costs such as rent and bills, giving me a more than adequate disposable income. I also know deep down that I have good qualifications that will eventually land me a graduate job. In addition, as much as I may sometimes complain, I do enjoy my work and it is gaining me a degree of useful experience in managing a small team and dealing with the general public. Anyone who knows me will also realise that I have for a long time been a little bit of a theme park enthusiast (the shame!) and so operating a £12million rollercoaster is significantly better than stacking shelves! It bears absolutely no relevance to what I want to do in future but we can't have it all. In some very tough economic times you must take what you can get.
I'm generally of the opinion that if I'm still struggling to find a graduate job by the end of the year, I'll likely leave the country on an elaborate travel adventure to some far flung and exotic corner of the globe. With time, the economic climate will improve and jobs will be more plentiful. Moreover, by then I would hope to have attained a little more relevant experience. Incidentally, if anyone reading has managed to combine travelling with gaining something meaningful and relevant to put on your CV I'd very much like to hear your suggestions.
To summarise this post: in future I'll be ditching the cynicism and reigning in the sarcasm. I may be frustrated but I'm also happy: I have a job, a home, a lovely girlfriend, lots of mates and decent prospects for the future. I have no excuse to be a miserable sod. What is more, I'm off to Barcelona on Thursday to enjoy some 28 degree sunshine and more than a little sangria!
I shall return next week when I intend to discuss the complicated art of CV writing. Until then, thanks for reading and keep commenting.
When I look at the facts I am in a healthy position. I am living at home and so face no costs such as rent and bills, giving me a more than adequate disposable income. I also know deep down that I have good qualifications that will eventually land me a graduate job. In addition, as much as I may sometimes complain, I do enjoy my work and it is gaining me a degree of useful experience in managing a small team and dealing with the general public. Anyone who knows me will also realise that I have for a long time been a little bit of a theme park enthusiast (the shame!) and so operating a £12million rollercoaster is significantly better than stacking shelves! It bears absolutely no relevance to what I want to do in future but we can't have it all. In some very tough economic times you must take what you can get.
I'm generally of the opinion that if I'm still struggling to find a graduate job by the end of the year, I'll likely leave the country on an elaborate travel adventure to some far flung and exotic corner of the globe. With time, the economic climate will improve and jobs will be more plentiful. Moreover, by then I would hope to have attained a little more relevant experience. Incidentally, if anyone reading has managed to combine travelling with gaining something meaningful and relevant to put on your CV I'd very much like to hear your suggestions.
To summarise this post: in future I'll be ditching the cynicism and reigning in the sarcasm. I may be frustrated but I'm also happy: I have a job, a home, a lovely girlfriend, lots of mates and decent prospects for the future. I have no excuse to be a miserable sod. What is more, I'm off to Barcelona on Thursday to enjoy some 28 degree sunshine and more than a little sangria!
I shall return next week when I intend to discuss the complicated art of CV writing. Until then, thanks for reading and keep commenting.
Wednesday 13 June 2012
Work Experience
As every day of job searching passes by, it becomes an ever greater frustration that I didn't spend more of my time at university accumulating that all important 'experience', rather than focusing the majority of my attention on my academic work. I simply didn't have the dedication to take up the unpaid summer placements and internships that seem so highly valued by employers. Instead, I spent my summers gallivanting around Europe with my friends. Fun but not exactly much of a CV filler.
Today it seems students must be prepared to dedicate those long summer months to personal improvement rather than rest and relaxation (don't they know its tough working 30 weeks of the year!). However, while those like myself lack the motivation, many more simply can't devote 12 weeks to working and living for nothing. For employers, summer student placements are a great trick; they gain an eager and intelligent workforce with no addition to their overheads. What is more they can claim they are acting entirely selflessly, helping future graduates gain valuable experience! But enough of my cynicism for now, the point of this little diatribe is that, in short, I did not take the time to pursue these opportunities. I lack relevant experience.
My first taste of unpaid employment came in Year 10 when I sallied forth from my High School to find a placement for a week: I lazily opted to spend time at my local primary school, which was enjoyable but bore little relation to my future career plans. Skip forward to my graduation in July 2010 and this remained the only workplace experience I could draw on, bar a few months working in a local restaurant.
It was time to organise something more significant: using a couple of local contacts I managed to arrange some time working in several departments of Staffordshire County Council. I got off to an inauspicious start after being asked to review a policy brochure, which I diligently did finding a number of minor linguistic criticisms, only to discover my supervisor for the morning had written it. Not the greatest way to endear yourself! But from that point onwards, the experience was useful and interesting. I was not made to feel like a tea boy (an often heard complaint of interns) and gained a good overview of local government. However, the placement, by the standards of employers, was not long enough. I've seen many supposed 'graduate' job adverts demand upwards of one year's experience in a relevant field; this seems unfair.
And so I reach the stage I am at today, having two degrees but very little 'real world' experience. It is not feasible for me to work and live for nothing so I must attempt to balance my minimum wage job with finding regular doses of more relevant (but unpaid) positions. This is easier said than done: while businesses are often prepared to take on someone for a week or two, or employ an intern for 12 weeks, it is more difficult to arrange one or two days per week over an indefinite period, which is ideally what I require. Given my personal interests, I have written to a number of local(ish) MPs of my particular political persuasion enquiring about any opportunities, but this is a very competitive field.
Work experience is the panacea that will cure my ills as a graduate job seeker. Nevertheless, who knew it could be this tricky to give away my services for nothing! If you're reading this and happen to have any work experience success/horror stories I'd love to hear them. Thanks for reading and keep commenting...
Today it seems students must be prepared to dedicate those long summer months to personal improvement rather than rest and relaxation (don't they know its tough working 30 weeks of the year!). However, while those like myself lack the motivation, many more simply can't devote 12 weeks to working and living for nothing. For employers, summer student placements are a great trick; they gain an eager and intelligent workforce with no addition to their overheads. What is more they can claim they are acting entirely selflessly, helping future graduates gain valuable experience! But enough of my cynicism for now, the point of this little diatribe is that, in short, I did not take the time to pursue these opportunities. I lack relevant experience.
My first taste of unpaid employment came in Year 10 when I sallied forth from my High School to find a placement for a week: I lazily opted to spend time at my local primary school, which was enjoyable but bore little relation to my future career plans. Skip forward to my graduation in July 2010 and this remained the only workplace experience I could draw on, bar a few months working in a local restaurant.
It was time to organise something more significant: using a couple of local contacts I managed to arrange some time working in several departments of Staffordshire County Council. I got off to an inauspicious start after being asked to review a policy brochure, which I diligently did finding a number of minor linguistic criticisms, only to discover my supervisor for the morning had written it. Not the greatest way to endear yourself! But from that point onwards, the experience was useful and interesting. I was not made to feel like a tea boy (an often heard complaint of interns) and gained a good overview of local government. However, the placement, by the standards of employers, was not long enough. I've seen many supposed 'graduate' job adverts demand upwards of one year's experience in a relevant field; this seems unfair.
And so I reach the stage I am at today, having two degrees but very little 'real world' experience. It is not feasible for me to work and live for nothing so I must attempt to balance my minimum wage job with finding regular doses of more relevant (but unpaid) positions. This is easier said than done: while businesses are often prepared to take on someone for a week or two, or employ an intern for 12 weeks, it is more difficult to arrange one or two days per week over an indefinite period, which is ideally what I require. Given my personal interests, I have written to a number of local(ish) MPs of my particular political persuasion enquiring about any opportunities, but this is a very competitive field.
Work experience is the panacea that will cure my ills as a graduate job seeker. Nevertheless, who knew it could be this tricky to give away my services for nothing! If you're reading this and happen to have any work experience success/horror stories I'd love to hear them. Thanks for reading and keep commenting...
Sunday 3 June 2012
(In)Competence
Its been almost a fortnight since my last instalment and in case any of you were wondering, I remain in search of graduate employment. However, despite my silence on the blogosphere, I have at least some positive news having had a telephone interview for the graduate scheme of an unnamed (cough) entertainments company. This being only the first stage in a long and arduous selection process, I'm not hugely optimistic of a positive outcome but at least they haven't thrown my application in the dustbin just yet...
The telephone interview took a very specific format and has prompted me to discuss a particular aspect of the graduate recruitment process: competene based questioning. With many large companies outsourcing the early stages of their selection process to recruitment consultants, the questions posed in initial telephone interviews are often vague and unspecific. They ask not about a candidate's suitability for a specific role, but instead ask for examples of certain key competencies, from leadership and teamwork to creativity and lateral thinking.
While I feel I am perfectly capable of demonstrating the majority of these faculties in given situations, I am frankly terrible at thinking of impressive and original examples, especially when prompted on the spot. No matter how many of these competencies I attempt to identify in advance and try to prepare for, I am invariably stumped by one or two I have neglected. In my case, this usually results in me bumbling my way through a fallacious and long-winded story loosely based on a distant past experience. In a recent unsuccessful interview, I created a largely fictitious (but very dramatic) tale of a teammate breaking an ankle on my gold Duke of Edinburgh's expedition as an example of my exceptional teamwork skills! Otherwise, I invariably resort to generic, unspecific and thoroughly unimpressive examples from my academic career which seem to go down like a lead balloon. Employers want substance it seems.
There is very little to stop candidates from simply making up examples of particular competencies. I have an old friend (who I hope is reading) that shamelessly added a charity climb of Kilimanjaro to his CV! It seems highly unlikely that any employer would take the time and effort to identify the veracity of a candidate's claims. So what are employers actually testing? This kind of questioning is just another meaningless way of filtering out a few more candidates, specifically those that lack the creativity or sheer gumption of others.
It is particularly frustrating to pass an initial screening process only to fall at the first significant hurdle, before you are given an opportunity to talk about the job or even company for which you have applied to work. It's just another one of the many hoops that graduates must jump through to land that first job. While lying is likely to land you in hot water further down the line, we've all been tempted to use a little creative licence to bolster our chances. For many of us, the reality of our day to day existence isn't quite enough to spark the interest of an employer searching for that 'unique' and 'special' candidate. Selling yourself is the name of the game and unfortunately it is a shameless and cynical process.
If any of those reading would like to share some of the tales you've told at interview that demonstrate what a talented person you are then I'd love to hear them.
Thanks once again for reading and don't forget to comment below...
The telephone interview took a very specific format and has prompted me to discuss a particular aspect of the graduate recruitment process: competene based questioning. With many large companies outsourcing the early stages of their selection process to recruitment consultants, the questions posed in initial telephone interviews are often vague and unspecific. They ask not about a candidate's suitability for a specific role, but instead ask for examples of certain key competencies, from leadership and teamwork to creativity and lateral thinking.
While I feel I am perfectly capable of demonstrating the majority of these faculties in given situations, I am frankly terrible at thinking of impressive and original examples, especially when prompted on the spot. No matter how many of these competencies I attempt to identify in advance and try to prepare for, I am invariably stumped by one or two I have neglected. In my case, this usually results in me bumbling my way through a fallacious and long-winded story loosely based on a distant past experience. In a recent unsuccessful interview, I created a largely fictitious (but very dramatic) tale of a teammate breaking an ankle on my gold Duke of Edinburgh's expedition as an example of my exceptional teamwork skills! Otherwise, I invariably resort to generic, unspecific and thoroughly unimpressive examples from my academic career which seem to go down like a lead balloon. Employers want substance it seems.
There is very little to stop candidates from simply making up examples of particular competencies. I have an old friend (who I hope is reading) that shamelessly added a charity climb of Kilimanjaro to his CV! It seems highly unlikely that any employer would take the time and effort to identify the veracity of a candidate's claims. So what are employers actually testing? This kind of questioning is just another meaningless way of filtering out a few more candidates, specifically those that lack the creativity or sheer gumption of others.
It is particularly frustrating to pass an initial screening process only to fall at the first significant hurdle, before you are given an opportunity to talk about the job or even company for which you have applied to work. It's just another one of the many hoops that graduates must jump through to land that first job. While lying is likely to land you in hot water further down the line, we've all been tempted to use a little creative licence to bolster our chances. For many of us, the reality of our day to day existence isn't quite enough to spark the interest of an employer searching for that 'unique' and 'special' candidate. Selling yourself is the name of the game and unfortunately it is a shameless and cynical process.
If any of those reading would like to share some of the tales you've told at interview that demonstrate what a talented person you are then I'd love to hear them.
Thanks once again for reading and don't forget to comment below...
Sunday 20 May 2012
A Fresh Perspective
It's time for the next instalment of acrimonious grumbling on the state of the graduate job market. I've decided to take a different approach with this week's post, responding to the excellent feedback provided by a former schoolmate of mine, Damien Jordan. He provides a useful and alternative approach to the nature of graduate employment. From within the comfortable bubble of university or facing the grim reality of repeated rejections, it is easy to lose sight of the issues facing employers in tough economic times. Below is Damien's response to 'Wasted Potential' (13th May 2012) verbatim:
"In a lot of ways I agree with what you're saying. I know that it is hard for many graduates to find positions within reputable companies and that investment in graduate development is minimal at best, but i do think think that graduates need to except a few things as well.
Luckily for me I never had a problem finding a job; admittedly i didn't work very hard at uni, didn't have any relevant experience and ended up getting a 2:2 in business from Durham University, which is basically worthless as no employer outside of the North East is really aware of Durham's reputation. But i managed to find a graduate role in Manchester selling commercial property within 1 month of me leaving. In my interview my employer stated that my university degree meant nothing and that they were more interested in the fact that I had managed to blag myself flights to Iceland on a charity jail break.
I think when it comes to graduate roles competition is greater than ever, you now have a pool of at least three years worth of graduates competing for a decreased amount of job roles in a dire economic climate. Graduates need to understand that businesses are looking at the bottom line and reinvestment is a big thing when many companies are struggling to cover their current overheads.
I also think many graduates set their hopes too high and need to be a bit more realistic in their aspirations, just because you get a 1st doesn't mean you will work in Canary Wharf.
Also when you say there are many talented graduates, what is this talent based on? I would describe talent as a proven ability; 95% of graduates have no proven ability in anything but studying which in the wider world is a pretty useless skill. I appreciate that it demonstrates a capacity to learn but given time anyone can learn anything especially with money as a motivator. Some of the most successful people in my office have a shocking academic background.
I feel that the role of university has now changed it shouldn't be looked at as a way to increase your average earnings by 15k a year. Instead, I feel university offers a place for people to study something they are interested in and develop as individuals in a social sense. The lessons I learnt at Uni have certainly helped me in my current job roles but none of these lessons were learnt in lectures.
Employers value skills such as the ability to sell, confidence, professionalism and drive. I don't feel university fosters any of these skills. I really think now that before someone goes to university they need to ask themselves what the realistic outcome is, unless you go to Cambridge or Oxford there are no guarantees regarding work. In most cases any role you get as a graduate could have been achieved through starting in work after GCSEs, 5 years of relevant experience will always trump 5 years of non-related education and that's just the way it is."
Damien raises some very good points. I am in complete agreement that graduates need to accept a few home truths in an undoubtedly torrid economic climate; the world certainly doesn't owe us a living. Moreover, I agree that university teaches us far more than what we learn in our lectures and seminars. In terms of personal development, I feel I am a completely different person to the spotty faced fresher that arrived at Sussex almost five years ago now (that makes me feel a little old...).
However, I do not think the role of university has necessarily changed. They have always been institutions that foster knowledge, learning and facilitate the pursuit of individual interests. What has changed is the attitudes of big business and the government to the role of higher education: there is a demand from certain sectors for universities to produce the finished corporate article. Employers seem to demand graduates with skills that university does not foster while failing to recognise attributes that it does; this article from May 2011 summarises the nature of the issue well. For example, the CBI has emphasised skills such as 'business and customer awareness' or 'the application of information technology', skills which my history degree has done little to foster. In contrast, 'communication', 'self-management' and 'problem solving' are intrinsic to the role of a good historian, yet are apparently lacking in today's cohort of graduates in the eyes of employers.
Moreover, I do believe a successful academic performance at university is indicative of more than simply the capacity to learn. It takes drive, dedication and professionalism to achieve the best results. Unfortunately, there is an overriding perception in popular culture of students as drunkards, layabouts and freeloaders. That's not to say I didn't spend a good amount of my student days drinking, sleeping and scrimping but I also worked hard. It's frustrating to hear these kind of accusations levelled at me in my local pub by middle aged alcoholics over their copies of the Daily Mail.
In short, I know that when I do manage to land a graduate job I'll be utilising skills I learnt at university, both socially and academically.
Once again, many thanks to Damien for his excellent response. I encourage you all to keep reading and keep commenting!
"In a lot of ways I agree with what you're saying. I know that it is hard for many graduates to find positions within reputable companies and that investment in graduate development is minimal at best, but i do think think that graduates need to except a few things as well.
Luckily for me I never had a problem finding a job; admittedly i didn't work very hard at uni, didn't have any relevant experience and ended up getting a 2:2 in business from Durham University, which is basically worthless as no employer outside of the North East is really aware of Durham's reputation. But i managed to find a graduate role in Manchester selling commercial property within 1 month of me leaving. In my interview my employer stated that my university degree meant nothing and that they were more interested in the fact that I had managed to blag myself flights to Iceland on a charity jail break.
I think when it comes to graduate roles competition is greater than ever, you now have a pool of at least three years worth of graduates competing for a decreased amount of job roles in a dire economic climate. Graduates need to understand that businesses are looking at the bottom line and reinvestment is a big thing when many companies are struggling to cover their current overheads.
I also think many graduates set their hopes too high and need to be a bit more realistic in their aspirations, just because you get a 1st doesn't mean you will work in Canary Wharf.
Also when you say there are many talented graduates, what is this talent based on? I would describe talent as a proven ability; 95% of graduates have no proven ability in anything but studying which in the wider world is a pretty useless skill. I appreciate that it demonstrates a capacity to learn but given time anyone can learn anything especially with money as a motivator. Some of the most successful people in my office have a shocking academic background.
I feel that the role of university has now changed it shouldn't be looked at as a way to increase your average earnings by 15k a year. Instead, I feel university offers a place for people to study something they are interested in and develop as individuals in a social sense. The lessons I learnt at Uni have certainly helped me in my current job roles but none of these lessons were learnt in lectures.
Employers value skills such as the ability to sell, confidence, professionalism and drive. I don't feel university fosters any of these skills. I really think now that before someone goes to university they need to ask themselves what the realistic outcome is, unless you go to Cambridge or Oxford there are no guarantees regarding work. In most cases any role you get as a graduate could have been achieved through starting in work after GCSEs, 5 years of relevant experience will always trump 5 years of non-related education and that's just the way it is."
Damien raises some very good points. I am in complete agreement that graduates need to accept a few home truths in an undoubtedly torrid economic climate; the world certainly doesn't owe us a living. Moreover, I agree that university teaches us far more than what we learn in our lectures and seminars. In terms of personal development, I feel I am a completely different person to the spotty faced fresher that arrived at Sussex almost five years ago now (that makes me feel a little old...).
However, I do not think the role of university has necessarily changed. They have always been institutions that foster knowledge, learning and facilitate the pursuit of individual interests. What has changed is the attitudes of big business and the government to the role of higher education: there is a demand from certain sectors for universities to produce the finished corporate article. Employers seem to demand graduates with skills that university does not foster while failing to recognise attributes that it does; this article from May 2011 summarises the nature of the issue well. For example, the CBI has emphasised skills such as 'business and customer awareness' or 'the application of information technology', skills which my history degree has done little to foster. In contrast, 'communication', 'self-management' and 'problem solving' are intrinsic to the role of a good historian, yet are apparently lacking in today's cohort of graduates in the eyes of employers.
Moreover, I do believe a successful academic performance at university is indicative of more than simply the capacity to learn. It takes drive, dedication and professionalism to achieve the best results. Unfortunately, there is an overriding perception in popular culture of students as drunkards, layabouts and freeloaders. That's not to say I didn't spend a good amount of my student days drinking, sleeping and scrimping but I also worked hard. It's frustrating to hear these kind of accusations levelled at me in my local pub by middle aged alcoholics over their copies of the Daily Mail.
In short, I know that when I do manage to land a graduate job I'll be utilising skills I learnt at university, both socially and academically.
Once again, many thanks to Damien for his excellent response. I encourage you all to keep reading and keep commenting!
Sunday 13 May 2012
Wasted Potential
William Hague today suggested we must all 'work harder' to drag the country out of recession, drawing parallels with Norman Tebbit's 'on your bike' message of the eighties, the suggestion being that many today are simply too feckless to do a hard day's graft. This idealised view of a depression era work-ethic is symptomatic of a wider problem associated with the current job market - that recent graduates are privileged, lazy and apparently know little of the so called 'real world'. While the man on the street has long perceived students this way, it seems employers are increasingly adopting a similar view. This brings me neatly on to this week's topic: that of demonstrable experience.
In my search for employment, it's particularly frustrating to see employers demanding two years relevant experience for supposed 'graduate' jobs. This is unfortunately a recent problem. In decades past candidates may have been employed based on their potential; a solid performance at university was indicative of the ability to grow into a job role (or so I am reliably informed!). Today, it seems recruiters are demanding fully fledged professionals immediately after graduation, as is demonstrated by the many demands from big employers to teach 'key business skills' - whatever they may be. It is entirely unreasonable of employers to expect candidates to have amassed a wealth of practical experience alongside their academic studies. Even those I know fortunate enough to have completed internships and summer placements (a significant financial burden for many) are struggling to land that all-important first graduate job.
The demands for 'experience' seem to be a problem for arts graduates in particular, where the transferable skills acquired are sidelined in favour of vocational qualifications. Employers want to minimise their risk rather than gambling on untested candidates. In my opinion, a balance must be struck. There will always be a demand for those with vocational skills, but the transferable skills acquired in more general degrees are equally important. These are graduates that can be shaped and moulded into a whole variety of job roles; it is the responsibility of employers to recognise potential and use it to their own benefit. There is a vast pool of talent out there but businesses seem increasingly unwilling to take a short-term risk for a long-term gain.
Instead, there are many talented graduates working in roles where their skills are either not needed or vastly underused. To take the example of my current minimum wage job, I work in a role that, in all reality, the vast majority of people could do with the right training. Many young, ambitious and talented people are working exceptionally hard in tough times, yet are not being offered the opportunities that will allow them to progress in their careers. In my layman's opinion, it is not 'working harder' that will drag the country out of recession, but investment in potential.
In my search for employment, it's particularly frustrating to see employers demanding two years relevant experience for supposed 'graduate' jobs. This is unfortunately a recent problem. In decades past candidates may have been employed based on their potential; a solid performance at university was indicative of the ability to grow into a job role (or so I am reliably informed!). Today, it seems recruiters are demanding fully fledged professionals immediately after graduation, as is demonstrated by the many demands from big employers to teach 'key business skills' - whatever they may be. It is entirely unreasonable of employers to expect candidates to have amassed a wealth of practical experience alongside their academic studies. Even those I know fortunate enough to have completed internships and summer placements (a significant financial burden for many) are struggling to land that all-important first graduate job.
The demands for 'experience' seem to be a problem for arts graduates in particular, where the transferable skills acquired are sidelined in favour of vocational qualifications. Employers want to minimise their risk rather than gambling on untested candidates. In my opinion, a balance must be struck. There will always be a demand for those with vocational skills, but the transferable skills acquired in more general degrees are equally important. These are graduates that can be shaped and moulded into a whole variety of job roles; it is the responsibility of employers to recognise potential and use it to their own benefit. There is a vast pool of talent out there but businesses seem increasingly unwilling to take a short-term risk for a long-term gain.
Instead, there are many talented graduates working in roles where their skills are either not needed or vastly underused. To take the example of my current minimum wage job, I work in a role that, in all reality, the vast majority of people could do with the right training. Many young, ambitious and talented people are working exceptionally hard in tough times, yet are not being offered the opportunities that will allow them to progress in their careers. In my layman's opinion, it is not 'working harder' that will drag the country out of recession, but investment in potential.
Sunday 6 May 2012
Job Search 101
My quest to find a graduate job has taken me to many far flung recesses of the world wide web - with so many sites and boards displaying lists of vacancies, it's often difficult to pick out the best opportunities. Many sites offer a huge array of different search options and filters designed to help you pick out the perfect job, however, in reality, the search is never simple.
The first obstacle you must overcome is the bane of many a graduate job seeker - recruitment consultancy. If you can figure out how to remove these jobs from your search then you have taken a significant step. Somehow jobs in recruitment seem to crop up in every sector (despite the recession!) - it seems there is always a ready market for arts graduates to help other arts graduates find jobs recruiting arts graduates. Without wishing to belittle the noble and ancient profession of recruitment consultancy, I can't help but feel that, although financially profitable, it is not a path that provides a great deal of career progression or job satisfaction (if you know otherwise feel free to set me straight). In short, it is not for me.
So, if you are able to remove these jobs from your search, what remains? If you are using some of the better known graduate job boards, for example Milkround, Target or Prospects, then you are most likely left with a selection of highly lucrative but exceptionally competitive graduate schemes. I have tried and failed in applying to a whole host of these - many seem the worst culprits for long winded application forms, banal testing and delayed responses. With hindsight, I don't think I would be suited to a life in big business but that is beside the point. Many statistics are quoted in the national press about 80 candidates responding to every available position and it is perhaps these jobs that they are referring to. An aspiring graduate must broaden their horizons if they wish to shorten their odds.
As Tanya de Grunwald and her excellent Graduate Fog website have suggested (I suggest you read for a far more thorough dissection of the problems faced by recent graduates), with a little extra effort things can be made easier. Smaller firms often don't have the time or the resources to advertise on the major jobs boards, instead preferring trade magazines and niche websites. By searching out these nooks and corners of the job market you are already displaying your quality as a candidate. Better still, your chances of employment are significantly increased. In addition, these firms often request only a CV and a Cover Letter, a format that is far less time consuming than the short essays demanded by some big companies. This is not to say that you shouldn't tailor an application to an employer, but at least you can be a little more efficient in the use of your time and even re-use certain sections. As a failing job seeker myself, you can take these tips with a pinch of salt, but I hope they may be of some use.
After many months without success, this is the approach on which I am now focusing my efforts. It remains to be seen whether it will deliver a result, but the jobs I am finding now seem a little more appropriate for my skill-set and importantly, more fulfilling.
The first obstacle you must overcome is the bane of many a graduate job seeker - recruitment consultancy. If you can figure out how to remove these jobs from your search then you have taken a significant step. Somehow jobs in recruitment seem to crop up in every sector (despite the recession!) - it seems there is always a ready market for arts graduates to help other arts graduates find jobs recruiting arts graduates. Without wishing to belittle the noble and ancient profession of recruitment consultancy, I can't help but feel that, although financially profitable, it is not a path that provides a great deal of career progression or job satisfaction (if you know otherwise feel free to set me straight). In short, it is not for me.
So, if you are able to remove these jobs from your search, what remains? If you are using some of the better known graduate job boards, for example Milkround, Target or Prospects, then you are most likely left with a selection of highly lucrative but exceptionally competitive graduate schemes. I have tried and failed in applying to a whole host of these - many seem the worst culprits for long winded application forms, banal testing and delayed responses. With hindsight, I don't think I would be suited to a life in big business but that is beside the point. Many statistics are quoted in the national press about 80 candidates responding to every available position and it is perhaps these jobs that they are referring to. An aspiring graduate must broaden their horizons if they wish to shorten their odds.
As Tanya de Grunwald and her excellent Graduate Fog website have suggested (I suggest you read for a far more thorough dissection of the problems faced by recent graduates), with a little extra effort things can be made easier. Smaller firms often don't have the time or the resources to advertise on the major jobs boards, instead preferring trade magazines and niche websites. By searching out these nooks and corners of the job market you are already displaying your quality as a candidate. Better still, your chances of employment are significantly increased. In addition, these firms often request only a CV and a Cover Letter, a format that is far less time consuming than the short essays demanded by some big companies. This is not to say that you shouldn't tailor an application to an employer, but at least you can be a little more efficient in the use of your time and even re-use certain sections. As a failing job seeker myself, you can take these tips with a pinch of salt, but I hope they may be of some use.
After many months without success, this is the approach on which I am now focusing my efforts. It remains to be seen whether it will deliver a result, but the jobs I am finding now seem a little more appropriate for my skill-set and importantly, more fulfilling.
Saturday 28 April 2012
Testing Testing
I assumed that after 17 years in full time education I'd had my fair share of tests, exams and assessments. It all began back in Year 2 with SATs - I can't remember them in the slightest but I'm going to assume I passed. Fast forward a decade and there were GCSEs and A-Levels, which at the time felt like they were the be all and end all. They were not; as with many things in life, it soon became apparent that they were merely stepping stones towards a far more diffuse aim, that of beginning that elusive thing known as 'a career'. After a further four years at university and the accordant exams, essays and dissertations, I was thoroughly tested out; but at least I had numerous certificates to prove my academic credentials and (I hoped) my intelligence.
Needless to say, when it comes to applying for graduate jobs this is not enough. During applications I have been subjected to a variety of tests and assessments, all of which are designed as a convenient method of unearthing the perfect candidate. Putting the practicalities of filtering through hundreds of applicants aside, it is more than a little frustrating to have my 17 years of education dismissed on the basis of a 15 minute online test. In my opinion, there are many different forms of intelligence, not all of which are tailored to answering logic puzzles or verbal reasoning questions. It is a means of selection that ensures successful candidates come from a very particular mould with a very generic skill set. This may be what businesses and other recruiters want, but I know they are dismissing very talented people on what appears to be an arbitrary basis; there is no room to prove creativity or demonstrate any strength of character. It seems like a lazy method of recruitment.
These tests take a variety of forms, some of which have come as a shock after four years studying humanities. Firstly, the verbal reasoning test: these questions comprise a short paragraph followed by a series of statements which the candidate must state as 'true', 'false' or 'cannot tell' based on the information given. Its not that these tests are phenomenally difficult (they perhaps suit my skills as a historian), but the time limits are tight - you must work quickly if you are to assess the text and answer 40 statements in 15 minutes. Secondly, there is the numeracy test which, having given up Maths after GCSE, certainly has proved challenging. In some spectacularly poor time management, on my first attempt at this type of assessment, I managed to answer 10 out of 20 questions in the allocated time - of the questions answered I managed to get 9 correct but this was largely irrelevant considering how long it was taking me to work through each conundrum. It seems I need to brush up on my skills.
Finally, we come to my most detested of all the tests used by employers, psychometric analysis. Tests where there is no right or wrong answer, merely scenarios designed to find out what kind of person you are - whether you are an introvert or an extrovert, to discover your work ethic, your attitudes and your weaknesses. I can only presume that recruiters associate particular traits with particular roles - again this seems arbitrary and unfair. Give me an interview and you would discover what type of person I am within five minutes.
I may be able to give you a detailed analysis of Rousseau's 'Social Contract' or Montesquieu's 'Spirit of the Laws'; ask me about the popular reaction to the French Revolution in Britain and I will talk to you for an hour - but none of this matters in the real world. Because I am not an extrovert and because I prefer to work independently, this is translated by some to mean 'boring' and not a 'team player'. I am no expert on psychology but I fear the likes of Jung and Freud would be turning in their graves if they saw the way their theories were manipulated and erroneously applied by some employers...
Needless to say, when it comes to applying for graduate jobs this is not enough. During applications I have been subjected to a variety of tests and assessments, all of which are designed as a convenient method of unearthing the perfect candidate. Putting the practicalities of filtering through hundreds of applicants aside, it is more than a little frustrating to have my 17 years of education dismissed on the basis of a 15 minute online test. In my opinion, there are many different forms of intelligence, not all of which are tailored to answering logic puzzles or verbal reasoning questions. It is a means of selection that ensures successful candidates come from a very particular mould with a very generic skill set. This may be what businesses and other recruiters want, but I know they are dismissing very talented people on what appears to be an arbitrary basis; there is no room to prove creativity or demonstrate any strength of character. It seems like a lazy method of recruitment.
These tests take a variety of forms, some of which have come as a shock after four years studying humanities. Firstly, the verbal reasoning test: these questions comprise a short paragraph followed by a series of statements which the candidate must state as 'true', 'false' or 'cannot tell' based on the information given. Its not that these tests are phenomenally difficult (they perhaps suit my skills as a historian), but the time limits are tight - you must work quickly if you are to assess the text and answer 40 statements in 15 minutes. Secondly, there is the numeracy test which, having given up Maths after GCSE, certainly has proved challenging. In some spectacularly poor time management, on my first attempt at this type of assessment, I managed to answer 10 out of 20 questions in the allocated time - of the questions answered I managed to get 9 correct but this was largely irrelevant considering how long it was taking me to work through each conundrum. It seems I need to brush up on my skills.
Finally, we come to my most detested of all the tests used by employers, psychometric analysis. Tests where there is no right or wrong answer, merely scenarios designed to find out what kind of person you are - whether you are an introvert or an extrovert, to discover your work ethic, your attitudes and your weaknesses. I can only presume that recruiters associate particular traits with particular roles - again this seems arbitrary and unfair. Give me an interview and you would discover what type of person I am within five minutes.
I may be able to give you a detailed analysis of Rousseau's 'Social Contract' or Montesquieu's 'Spirit of the Laws'; ask me about the popular reaction to the French Revolution in Britain and I will talk to you for an hour - but none of this matters in the real world. Because I am not an extrovert and because I prefer to work independently, this is translated by some to mean 'boring' and not a 'team player'. I am no expert on psychology but I fear the likes of Jung and Freud would be turning in their graves if they saw the way their theories were manipulated and erroneously applied by some employers...
Friday 20 April 2012
A Difficult Balancing Act
Like many before me, I face the difficult balancing act of staying afloat financially while searching for relevant work experience that will help me in my quest for graduate employment. It is perhaps my greatest regret that during my time at university I did little to secure the placements and internships that seem to be so sought after by employers.
Now, six months after graduation, I am in a tricky situation. I am already lumbered with £20,000+ of student debt and having received significant financial support from my parents over my four years of studying, I am keen to finally support myself. I currently work full-time for £6.13 per hour and it is a job that I do enjoy, if you had told my 14 year old self that I would be operating roller coasters for a living I would have been delighted. I bring home about £200 per week which is plenty considering I live at home; however, my work does little to gain me the kind of experience that will secure me that all important first graduate job.
I have set my sights on a job in politics or the media. Having submitted a number of applications for work as a political researcher with little success, I have come to the conclusion that I must be prepared to offer my services for free if I want to progress up the career ladder. There are many internships and placements that would appeal. However, given that our political nation is focused so heavily on London (a consequence of having one of the most centralised systems of government in Europe!), I am left in a financial quandary. These internships offer 'expenses' which amount to a Zone 1 railcard and a fiver for lunch - factor in living costs and twelve weeks working for free in London is an insurmountable financial barrier.
Lets look at some basic figures - a modest flat in central London could set you back upwards of £150 per week; a minimum of £1800 over a twelve week period. Add to this £40 per week for food and another £30 for having some form of social life then we are talking upwards of £2500. It would seem internships are the reserve of the wealthy, the privileged or those who are fortunate enough to live within commuting distance of the capital. I realise there are opportunities outside of London, but in certain sectors these are few and far between. It is a frustrating situation.
In addition, firms seem oblivious to the financial burdens that job seekers can face. Upon submitting an application to a London based media firm earlier this year, I was asked to 'call in for a 10 minute chat' to see if I was suitable for interview. Considering a 10 minute chat would require a £60 rail fare and an entire day off work I was understandably reluctant.
It would seem that for now I must content myself with earning a fraction above the minimum wage until I can find an affordable way to gain 'relevant experience'. I would be lying if I did not say that writing this blog was a shameless attempt to prove my employability and gain such experience in more unusual (and cheaper!) ways.
Thank you for reading, if you've had any similar experiences I strongly encourage you to comment...
Now, six months after graduation, I am in a tricky situation. I am already lumbered with £20,000+ of student debt and having received significant financial support from my parents over my four years of studying, I am keen to finally support myself. I currently work full-time for £6.13 per hour and it is a job that I do enjoy, if you had told my 14 year old self that I would be operating roller coasters for a living I would have been delighted. I bring home about £200 per week which is plenty considering I live at home; however, my work does little to gain me the kind of experience that will secure me that all important first graduate job.
I have set my sights on a job in politics or the media. Having submitted a number of applications for work as a political researcher with little success, I have come to the conclusion that I must be prepared to offer my services for free if I want to progress up the career ladder. There are many internships and placements that would appeal. However, given that our political nation is focused so heavily on London (a consequence of having one of the most centralised systems of government in Europe!), I am left in a financial quandary. These internships offer 'expenses' which amount to a Zone 1 railcard and a fiver for lunch - factor in living costs and twelve weeks working for free in London is an insurmountable financial barrier.
Lets look at some basic figures - a modest flat in central London could set you back upwards of £150 per week; a minimum of £1800 over a twelve week period. Add to this £40 per week for food and another £30 for having some form of social life then we are talking upwards of £2500. It would seem internships are the reserve of the wealthy, the privileged or those who are fortunate enough to live within commuting distance of the capital. I realise there are opportunities outside of London, but in certain sectors these are few and far between. It is a frustrating situation.
In addition, firms seem oblivious to the financial burdens that job seekers can face. Upon submitting an application to a London based media firm earlier this year, I was asked to 'call in for a 10 minute chat' to see if I was suitable for interview. Considering a 10 minute chat would require a £60 rail fare and an entire day off work I was understandably reluctant.
It would seem that for now I must content myself with earning a fraction above the minimum wage until I can find an affordable way to gain 'relevant experience'. I would be lying if I did not say that writing this blog was a shameless attempt to prove my employability and gain such experience in more unusual (and cheaper!) ways.
Thank you for reading, if you've had any similar experiences I strongly encourage you to comment...
Sunday 15 April 2012
'We regret to inform you that your application has been unsuccessful...'
It has been seven months now since leaving university and my search for graduate employment has delivered a rather harsh dose of reality. In September 2011, fresh after handing in my dissertation, I was full of optimism - I was 22 years old, held a first class degree and barring a disaster would soon have an MA. The job market was surely my oyster...
Then came the application forms.
It's not that I'm bitter or anything (I am bitter) but the hours I have spent filling out reams of personal information and answering banal questions on my team building and problem solving credentials could have been better spent.
What particularly sticks in the throat is that on more than one occasion I have received an automated rejection only a few hours after submitting my application in the first place. I can only assume that some aspect of my character has been deemed unworthy by the many filters designed to separate the men from the chaff (a favourite mixed metaphor of mine...).
To add insult to injury, because many graduate schemes (as the rejection emails do not hesitate to tell me) are so very popular, firms are unable to provide any feedback whatsoever. I can't help but feel taken for a ride - if I can spend 3 hours filling out a tediously dull application form, then surely the computer that rejected me can let me know on what pre-conditioned criteria I was filtered out?
Applicants deserve a level of transparency. If, for instance, a firm is not looking to recruit history graduates, make this clear in the job description. In a job market that is tougher than ever, to spend my precious days off filling out forms for jobs that I subsequently discover I had no chance of getting is somewhat galling.
Perhaps I am doing recruiters a disservice, perhaps they are indeed ruthlessly efficient in their selection of candidates. Then again, submitting an application at 11pm and receiving a rejection at 5am the following morning may suggest otherwise...
Rant over.
Then came the application forms.
It's not that I'm bitter or anything (I am bitter) but the hours I have spent filling out reams of personal information and answering banal questions on my team building and problem solving credentials could have been better spent.
What particularly sticks in the throat is that on more than one occasion I have received an automated rejection only a few hours after submitting my application in the first place. I can only assume that some aspect of my character has been deemed unworthy by the many filters designed to separate the men from the chaff (a favourite mixed metaphor of mine...).
To add insult to injury, because many graduate schemes (as the rejection emails do not hesitate to tell me) are so very popular, firms are unable to provide any feedback whatsoever. I can't help but feel taken for a ride - if I can spend 3 hours filling out a tediously dull application form, then surely the computer that rejected me can let me know on what pre-conditioned criteria I was filtered out?
Applicants deserve a level of transparency. If, for instance, a firm is not looking to recruit history graduates, make this clear in the job description. In a job market that is tougher than ever, to spend my precious days off filling out forms for jobs that I subsequently discover I had no chance of getting is somewhat galling.
Perhaps I am doing recruiters a disservice, perhaps they are indeed ruthlessly efficient in their selection of candidates. Then again, submitting an application at 11pm and receiving a rejection at 5am the following morning may suggest otherwise...
Rant over.
Friday 13 April 2012
Desperate Times, Desperate Measures
Friends, Romans, members of the Blogosphere, lend me your ears...
I, Alex Hough, an erstwhile student and incumbent ride host at a *cough* unnamed Staffordshire theme park (there are two...), have decided to start a blog.
For those of you who do not know me, I graduated with an MA in History in September 2011 from a good University. While my historical studies interested me greatly, it is writing that has always been my passion; in recent months I have had little opportunity to exercise my scholastic muscles and that is why I find myself here... I happen to believe writing is not like riding a bike and is instead a talent that needs to be constantly refreshed.
I intend to write about the many trials and tribulations of finding a graduate job . In the months since my graduation I have come to the frustrating realisation that no matter how impressive your academic record, experience counts for everything. As a man with little experience of anything (such are the consequences of growing up in a quiet corner of rural Staffordshire), I have reached somewhat of an impasse in my search.
If anyone is prepared to listen, I'd also like to write about a few of my other interests from politics and current affairs to sport. Mix this in with a few observations on my current place of employment (the kind that won't get me fired) and perhaps this could become interesting, informative or even amusing. We shall see, particularly on that last one...
In all seriousness, if you are reading this and feel you are in a similar situation or would also like to comment on the struggles of recent graduates please get in touch. Many hands make light work and all.
That's all for now but I shall begin in earnest soon...
All the best, Alex
I, Alex Hough, an erstwhile student and incumbent ride host at a *cough* unnamed Staffordshire theme park (there are two...), have decided to start a blog.
For those of you who do not know me, I graduated with an MA in History in September 2011 from a good University. While my historical studies interested me greatly, it is writing that has always been my passion; in recent months I have had little opportunity to exercise my scholastic muscles and that is why I find myself here... I happen to believe writing is not like riding a bike and is instead a talent that needs to be constantly refreshed.
I intend to write about the many trials and tribulations of finding a graduate job . In the months since my graduation I have come to the frustrating realisation that no matter how impressive your academic record, experience counts for everything. As a man with little experience of anything (such are the consequences of growing up in a quiet corner of rural Staffordshire), I have reached somewhat of an impasse in my search.
If anyone is prepared to listen, I'd also like to write about a few of my other interests from politics and current affairs to sport. Mix this in with a few observations on my current place of employment (the kind that won't get me fired) and perhaps this could become interesting, informative or even amusing. We shall see, particularly on that last one...
In all seriousness, if you are reading this and feel you are in a similar situation or would also like to comment on the struggles of recent graduates please get in touch. Many hands make light work and all.
That's all for now but I shall begin in earnest soon...
All the best, Alex
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)